dog + God = cool
11.16.05

ok, it's about time for another one of those mega-updates that usually comes after i've enjoyed a rather lazy or busy (or both?) hiatus. i bought a dog, or rather a puppy for my girlfriend. now don't go getting your panties in a bunch. we talked about it. we've been talking about it. it's been really really talked about a lot. she's ready for a dog, yes, a real dog, so i got her one. it is the big x-mas present of the year. and for whoever is wondering about the little girl, here are some sweet pictures of her that were recently updated:

the unsinkable molly brown!
she's the bright pink girl, #7!

not too long ago i was browsing the blogosphere, checking out the who's who of th blogging world. actually, i never find myself reading blogs of "important" people. too boring. but yeah, i was surfing around and came across this dude from kansas who has some really good ideas. check out this stuff from one of his latest posts following a conference with brian mclaren, it got me thinking about some crazy stuff:

"easily the most controversial topic of the day was when he asked us to rethink our notion of conquest and control and the role in plays in the life of the church. the bible was written, both old and new testaments, mostly in a time when God's people were a minority, a marginalized group of stragglers and strays who were looked down on and often persecuted by surrounding society. but a few hundred years after Jesus, something happened. a roman emperor became a Christian and this "new" religion was thrust into a situation of power than it wasn't prepared for and maybe shouldn't have accepted. but for better or for worse, the church ruled the western world for centuries. wars were fought in the name of Jesus, people who didn't agree with the church were tortured and killed, entire continents were stolen away from the indigenous people, genocide was committed by "Christians." our faith was forced on people against their will. Jesus was communicated through conquest and control. and although modernity dethroned the church as the ultimate authority in favor of reason and science, we've retained some of that conquering attitude. sometimes we long for the "good old days" of being in charge, instead of the really old days of being persecuted and hated.

the church no longer holds a sacred place in our society. we've been marginalized in another way...we've made ourselves irrelevant and ignored. but we are not persecuted, at least in the west. yet we still hold onto that militaristic language that created the need for our removal from power in the first place. we still talk of "taking back the nation for Jesus." our most famous speakers still hold crusades. we seek to convert non-Christians instead of invite them. we sing 'onward Christian soldiers', 'soldiers of Christ arise', etc., and teach our children to be in the 'Lord's army.' does that sound eerily familiar to anyone else? how is this better than jihad? because we are right and they are wrong? or because those in power get to set the rules, and we long to set the rules for others instead of settling for playing by the different rules of Christ's kingdom?

sure, there is plenty of war language in the bible, particularly in the ot. but as mclaren pointed out, there is a marked difference in conquest language used by people who are fighting for their survival against vicious oppressors and conquest language used by people who are wealthy and fat and who have sacrificed their credibility by selling out to the values of their culture. it's different to be fighting for your own rights than to be fighting for power with which to overrule the rights of others. that power sounds like what Jesus catagorically avoided during his time on earth. mclaren asked for a shift in values from conquest and control to one of conservation. conservation of the environment, of course, but that's only part of the story. conservation of the rights and lives of others, honoring what's beautiful about them as God-given and inviting into the kingdom, but not forcing them to play by our rules until they choose to.

he reminded us of the incident in march 2001 where the taliban destroyed the gigantic, ancient statues of buddha that had been carved into the side of a mountain near bamiyan long before islam was ever heard of. there was worldwide outrage that these historical artworks had been desecrated. his question to the audience was, if you had lived in afganistan at the time, in fact, if Christians had ruled afganistan, would you have felt it was your Christian duty to support the destruction of those statues or to speak out and stand against the effort to blow them up?

good stuff. great stuff. my thinking lately just seems to run in line with this kind of material.

it has just hit me that at 3 on wednesday i officially begin my thanksgiving break. crap. how'd that sneak up on me?


check it out - 01.20.07
vapor - 11.15.06
can't complain - 11.10.06
turn the page - 11.09.06
who invented the word "me-maw"? - 09.28.06

<< :: >> | random